Complaint
Start with the presenting problem and the high-risk considerations that matter for emergency medicine.
NOT ANOTHER SCRIBE.
Clinical reasoning infrastructure for emergency medicine.
Run the case before disposition.
Join the early clinician listDeveloped with emergency physician review from day one.
case lineChest pain · 31F · pregnant · diabetes mellitus
01clear
Chief complaint1/8 selectedAbdominal painChest painHeadacheFeverDyspnea / shortness of breathCough / URIBack painDizziness / vertigo
02clear
Patient context2 active · soft elevationoptional · highlights relevant dxesPregnantPostpartumOn anticoagulationSickle cell diseaseImmunocompromisedDiabetes mellitusKnown CAD or prior MICOPD
03clear
Working diagnosis1/5 selectedclinician selectsACS workupPEAortic dissectionSilent / atypical ACSSpontaneous PTX
04clear
History2/6 selectedPleuriticSudden onsetDyspneaSyncopeHemoptysisCalf swelling
05clear
Exam & status2/4 selectedTachycardiaTachypneaHypoxiaCalf tender
06clear
Workup & ED course4/10 selectedLABS
D-dimer elevatedD-dimer negative
IMAGING
CTA-PE positiveCTA-PE negativeV/Q scan
ECG & MONITOR
Sinus tachycardiaS1Q3T3RBBB
THERAPEUTICS
Heparin givenAlteplase given
07clear
ReasoningWells low (0-1)Wells moderate (2-6)Wells high (>6)PERC negativePERC positivePursued as concernLow pretest
08clear
Disposition4 selected · 1/5 universal · 2/4 admit-to · 1/3 dx-specificUNIVERSAL
DischargeAdmitObservationTransferAMA
ADMIT TO
Med-surgTelemetryStepdownICU
DX-SPECIFIC
FOR DX
Anticoag startedDC workup negHeme follow-up
MDM OUTPUT
PATIENT CONTEXT A 31-year-old female patient with pregnancy and diabetes mellitus presented with chest pain.HISTORY Pleuritic chest pain with associated dyspnea.EXAM Tachycardic and tachypneic on examination.WORKUP ECG was significant for sinus tachycardia, D-dimer was elevated, V/Q scan was part of the pulmonary embolism workup, and heparin was given.REASONING Pulmonary embolism was pursued as the working concern given the selected chest pain, pleuritic pain, dyspnea, tachycardia, elevated D-dimer, and pregnancy anchors.DISPOSITION The patient was admitted to stepdown with telemetry, with anticoagulation started.
CLAIM LEDGER
Representative draft language is limited to selected anchors shown in the rails above.
Static preview only. No autonomous diagnosis. No disposition recommendation.
EARLY WORKFLOW PREVIEW
Static preview of Corso’s current reasoning architecture. Clinical content is under active clinician review.
FROM ANCHORS TO MDM
Selected anchors become editable MDM direction.
Corso is being built around the path emergency clinicians already reason through: presenting complaint, selected considerations, history, exam, workup, ED course, and disposition documentation.
Anchors
Select the history, exam, workup, and course details that actually support the reasoning.
Draft
Turn selected anchors into editable MDM direction that remains clinician-owned.
High-risk considerations, not generic differentials.
Corso surfaces the high-risk considerations that matter for the presenting complaint. You decide which are in play, which are ruled down, and what needs to be documented.
Clinician-confirmed anchors.
Every consideration is tied to the history, exam, workup, or reassessment finding that addresses it. The MDM reflects what you confirmed, not what a model assumed.
Defensible MDM, composed from your reasoning.
Corso turns clinician-confirmed anchors into editable MDM language, with every line traceable to the reasoning you selected.
THE PATH FROM COMPLAINT TO DISPOSITION
Chief complaint
Working considerations
History · Exam · Workup
Reasoning anchors
Disposition
One coherent path to disposition, with clinician-confirmed anchors at each step. The MDM follows from those anchors.
POSITIONING
More than a scribe. Not an autopilot.
Scribes and ambient note tools capture what happened. Corso is being built for the reasoning layer — what was considered, what was ruled down, what supports the disposition, and what should be documented before the MDM is final.
Scribes capture the encounter. Corso structures the reasoning before documentation is final.
SCRIBE / AMBIENT NOTE FLOW
- What was said
- Transcribed encounter
- Generated note
- Clinician edits output
CORSO REASONING FLOW
- What was considered
- Clinician-confirmed anchors
- Defensible MDM structure
- Clinician owns every line
One captures the encounter. The other structures the reasoning.
Read the comparisonPRODUCT POSTURE
What Corso is, and what it is not.
Corso sits at the reasoning layer for emergency medicine: not ambient capture, not autopilot, and not a generic checklist.
What Corso is
- A reasoning layer for emergency medicine documentation.
- A way to organize clinician-selected anchors before MDM is final.
- A reviewable path from complaint to disposition.
- A way to keep high-risk considerations visible while clinicians decide what matters.
What Corso is not
- Not an ambient scribe.
- Not a generic differential checklist.
- Not clinical autopilot.
CLINICAL REVIEW
Built with emergency physician review from day one.
Built around visible basis and emergency physician review. Clinical content remains under active review, and future product surfaces should make it easier to see why draft language or workflow cues appeared.
TRUST & SAFETY
A public boundary for clinician control.
Corso is early, under active clinical review, and designed around clinician-owned documentation. The website is a product preview and early-access path, not a clinical tool.
Read the trust and safety postureEARLY ACCESS
Join the early clinician list.
Corso is still early. We are inviting a small group of emergency clinicians to review the reasoning workflow, give feedback, and help shape the product before broader access.